Compare Hard Money vs Commercial—adjust the fields below to see costs and cash needed in real time. Continue below for a full analysis from our case studies.
Feb 2024
Jan 2025
| Hard Money Financing | Commercial Financing | |
| Loan Amount | 65% of ARV = $156,000 | 85% of Purchase = $129,388.70 85% of Rehab = $34,850 Total Loan: $164,238.70 |
| Interest Rate | 12% | 8.5% |
| Origination Fee | 3% of loan = $4,680 | $2,300 (includes closing costs, appraisal, title fees) |
| Monthly Payment | $1,950 (12% of $156,000 ÷ 12) | $1,166.68 (8.5% of $164,238.70 ÷ 12) |
| Total Financing Cost (6 months) | Interest: $11,700 Origination Fee: $4,680 Total Cost: $16,380 |
Interest: $7,798.75 Origination Fee + Costs: $2,300 Total Cost: $10,098.75 |
| Investor's Money Required | $193,222 (purchase + rehab) Loan: $156,000 Investor's Cash to Bring: $37,222 |
$193,222 (purchase + rehab) Loan: $164,238.70 Investor's Cash to Bring: $28,983.30 |
For larger projects like 1024 Rockdale St, Commercial Financing is usually the best route. Here’s why:
Note for Commercial Financing: Although Hard Money is often associated with requiring less out-of-pocket costs, in this case, the investor using Commercial Financing had lower upfront costs because commercial lenders lend up to 80% of ARV. Additionally, the person who used Commercial Financing saved money in the long term due to lower interest rates and better terms.
| Hard Money Financing | Commercial Financing | |
| Loan Amount | 65% of ARV = $130,000 | 85% of Purchase = $99,535 85% of Rehab = $14,450 Total Loan: $113,985 |
| Interest Rate | 12% | 8.5% |
| Origination Fee | 3% of loan = $3,900 | $2,300 (includes closing costs, appraisal, title fees) |
| Monthly Payment | $1,300 (12% of $130,000 ÷ 12) | $805.94 (8.5% of $113,985 ÷ 12) |
| Total Financing Cost (6 months) | Interest: $15,600 Origination Fee: $3,900 Total Cost: $19,500 |
Interest: $4,848.73 Origination Fee + Costs: $2,300 Total Cost: $7,148.73 |
| Investor's Money Required | $134,100 (purchase + rehab) Loan: $130,000 Investor's Cash to Bring: $4,100 |
$134,100 (purchase + rehab) Loan: $113,985 Investor's Cash to Bring: $20,115 |
While Commercial Financing is great for larger, long-term projects like 1024 Rockdale St, Hard Money Financing might be a better option for properties like 124 Elm Ave. Here’s why:
Note for Hard Money Financing: Even though Commercial Financing typically requires a higher down payment, Hard Money still might be the right choice here, especially when you need to close fast. Even though you have to put more money down for Commercial Financing, Hard Money is faster and more flexible in some situations. However, if you're looking at the total financing cost, Commercial Financing may still be the better long-term choice.
Hard Money Financing is an excellent quick fix for new investors or those working on time-sensitive projects. It helps you get deals closed quickly but comes with a higher price tag. On the other hand, Commercial Financing is the better long-term option for serious investors. It offers lower interest rates, longer loan terms, and the potential to build a relationship with your lender, ultimately helping you save money in the future.
In the end, Hard Money is great for quick deals, while Commercial Financing is better for those looking to save money over time and build a relationship with a lender for better financing options.